PLANET 50:50, SOCIAL CAPITAL, AND PORTRAITS THE ROAD OF BENGKULU WOMEN TOWARD THE NATIONAL PARLIAMENT
Abstract
This study attempts to inspect the issue of gender politics in Indonesia, focusing on the electoral struggle of female legislative candidates in the region of Bengkulu. The UN’s program, Planet 50:50, will be taken into account in gauging the extent of these candidates’ success amidst the predominantly patriarchal culture across three elections (2009, 2014, 2019)... Being a qualitative study based on discourse analysis, this study will primarily employ the concept of social capital by Pierre Bordeau (1986) and David Putnam (1993). Among the significant findings are: first, in addition to building a primordial network of religious and ethnic organizations as every Indonesian legislative candidate commonly does, female national parliament candidates in Bengkulu must work harder to create community empowerment to gain more public trust and establish the norm that women are genuinely fit and capable for election and re-election. Second, community empowerment is performed via various programs for first-time voters, youth, women, educators, and farmers; in addition to utilization of different media to promote tourism and market products. This study, hopefully, may enrich pre-existing discourse on gender and politics by juxtaposing its local practices with the ideals encapsulated in the SDG target that is Planet 50:50.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anselim Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1997. Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Grounded Procedures, Techniques, and Theory. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, p. 13.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. In Outline of a Theory of Practice. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812507
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre.1986. The Forms of Capital. Dalam J Richardson, ed. Handboooks of Theory and research for Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Emejulu, A.2015.Community Development as Micro Politics Comparing theories, policies and politics in America and Britain.Bristol: Policy Press.
Evangela dan Theodore. 2016. A Typology of Voters: Creating Voter’s Profiles via Clustering. Journal Politics, Departement of Political Science Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Gibbs, J. P., & Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579680.
Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469.
Greenstein, F. 1. 1975. Personality and politics In F. I. Greenstein, & N. W. Polsby (Eds.), The handbook of political science: Micropolitical theory. Vol. 2 (pp. 1-92). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Halim, R., Muhlin, M., & Salam, R. 2018. Political participation of communities in the Legislative General Elections (Pemilu). Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 31(3), 278. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v31i32018.278-290
Harrop, Martin and Miller, William L., 1987. Election And Voters A Comparative Introduction. MacMillan Press. hal. 132-162.
Herbert McClosky.1972. Political Participation. New York: The Macmillan
Krishna, A. 2002. Enhancing Political Participation in Democracies What is the Role of Social Capital? Comparative Political Studies, 35(4), 437–460.
La Due Lake, R., & Huckfeldt, R. 1998. Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00118
Lee, A.-R., & Glasure, Y. U. 2007. Social Capital and Political Participation in South Korea. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 34(2), 101–118.
Lin, N. 1995. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Lips Hilary M. 1993. Sex & Gender: An Introduction. Michigan (US): Mayfield Publishing.
Loraine Blaxter et.al., How to Research, Jakarta: Indeks, 2006, p. 93.
Lovenduski J. 2005. State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lupia A and Mathew M. 2000. Representation or abdication? How citizens use institutions to help delegation succeed. European Journal of Political Research 37: p.291-307.
Malau W. 2014. Pengarusutamaan Gender dalam Program Pembangunan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. 6 (2): 125-131.
Mochtar, Jenny. 2008 . “Membaca Ideologi Jender dalam Chick Lit Inggris dan Indonesia”. Disertasi UI.
Marsden, P. V., & Lin, N. (Eds.). 1982. Social structure and network analysis . Beverly Hills: Sage Publication. p. 201-218.
Neuman, W. L. 2011. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Pearson education.
Norman K. Denzin dan Yvonna S. Lincoln (ed.). 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
Oakley A. 1973. Sex, Gender, and Society. Michigan (US): Maurice Temple Smith Ltd.
Pantouw, Stella Maria Ignasia. 2012. MODALITAS DALAM KONTESTASI POLITIK (Studi tentang Modalitas dalam Kemenangan Pasangan Hanny Sondakh dan Maximiliaan Lomban pada Pemilukada di Kota Bitung Sulawesi Utara tahun 2010). Masters thesis, Program Pascasarjana Undip.
Paxton, P. 2002. Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088895
Portes, Alejandro, Landolt, P., Portes, A., & Landolt, P. 2000. Social Capital : Promise and Pitfalls of its Role in Development Social Capital : Promise and Pitfalls of its Role in Development. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(September 2000), 529–547.
Phillips, Rhonda & Pittman, Robert (ed).2009. An Introduction to Community Development.New York:Routledge.
Putnam Robert. D. 1993. The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. E- mail article. The American Prospect 4(13):35–42.
Putnam. Robert D.1993. Making Democracy Work : Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
Putnam, Robert D., Robert Leonardi, and Raffaella Y. Nanetti. 1993. Making Democracy Work : Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, Robert. 2002. “Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society.”
Pranarka, A.M.W dan Vidhyandika. 1996. “Pemberdayaan (empowerment)”. Onny Prijono dan Pranarka (ed). Pemberdayaan, Konsep, Kebijakan dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
Ramon- Harris: Ana-Elia Ramón-Hidalgo & Leila M. Harris (2018) Social Capital, political empowerment and social difference: a mixed-methods study of an ecotourism project in the rural Volta region of Ghana, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26:12, 2153-2172,
Rasyidin .2018. Gender dan Politik: Keterwakilan Perempuan dalam Politik. Publisher: Unimal Press. ISBN: 978-602-1373-73-6
Rozi, Syafuan dan Abdul Azis . 2020. Grand Disain dan Peta Jalan Indonesia Menuju Planet 50:50 Kesetaran Gender 2030. Asdep Gender dan Politik. KPPPA RI.
Scott, J. 2000. Rational Choice Theory. In G. Browning, A. Halcli, & F. Webster (Eds.), Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present. New York: Sage Publications.
Teney, C., & Hanquinet, L. 2012. High political participation, high social capital? A relational analysis of youth social capital and political participation. Social Science Research, 41(5), 1213–1226.
Sowards, Stacey K. and Renegar, Valerie R. 2004. “The rhetorical functions of consciousness-raising in third wave feminism.” Communication Studies. West Lafayette: Winter. Vol. 55.
Utari Vipriyanti, Nyoman. 2007.Studi Sosial Ekonomi tentang Keterkaitan antara Modal Sosial dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Wilayah: Studi Kasus di Empat Kabupaten di Provinsi Bali. Sekolah Pascasarjana IPB.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. 2000. Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
Woolcock, Michael. 1998. Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006884930135
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.