MEDIA OWNERSHIP AND DEMOCRACY PROCESSES IN INDONESIA

Firman ., Restu Rahmawati

Abstract

This paper highlights the impact of media ownership on the democratic process in Indonesia. The research employs literature analysis and case studies to gather data from various relevant sources. The findings indicate that the concentration of media ownership significantly affects democracy in Indonesia, in the sense that it may lead to a proliferation of biased information and opinions,  while simultaneously hampering the diversity of perspectives  within society. However, these risks can be mitigated by sustaining press freedom, effective regulations, and strong public participation; Transparency, accountability, and robust media freedom are highly necessary to ensure a healthy diversity of media ownership and equitable information distribution in Indonesia. The article concludes that it is important to continuously monitor and study the relationship between media ownership and political influence within the context of democracy in Indonesia. Collaboration among the government, media, and civil society is key to maintaining a healthy balance between media freedom and the protection of a diverse and inclusive democratic process

Keywords

Media Ownership; Political Influence; Independent Media; Democratic Process

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aulia, D. (2016). Penguatan Demokrasi: Partai Politik Dan (Sistem) Pemilu Sebagai Pilar Demokrasi. Masyarakat Indonesia, 42(1), 115–126.

Bagdikian, B. H. (2004). The new media monopoly: A completely revised and updated edition with seven new chapters. Beacon Press.

Baker, C. E. (2001). Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Barsamian, D., & Chomsky, N. (2001). Propaganda and the public mind: Conversations with Noam Chomsky. Pluto Press.

Bennett, T. (2005). Media,‘reality’’, signification.’ In Culture, society and the media (pp. 285–306). Routledge.

Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39.

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.

Castells, M. (2010). The information age. Media Studies: A Reader, 2(7), 152.

Chomsky, N., & Arcal, L. (2002). Propaganda. Danger public.

Curran, J. (2011). Media and democracy. taylor & francis.

Dahlia, R. R., & Permana, P. A. (2022). Oligarki Media dalam Pusaran Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia 2019 Menuju 2024. POLITICOS: Jurnal Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 2(1), 65–81.

Hariyadi, T. (2018). Runtuhnya Pilar Demokrasi, Politik Kuasa Media Partai Perindo Di MNC Grup. Dynamic Media, Communications, and Culture: Conference Proceedings, 1, 110–130.

Khotimah, N. (2019). Tantangan Independensi Media Dalam Pemilu: Kasus Kompas. com. Islamic Communication Journal, 4(2), 133–145.

Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2003). All News Media Inc. New York Times Online.

Kurniasari, N., & Aji, G. G. (2018). Kepemilikan dan bingkai media (Analisis framing pemberitaan Joko Widodo sebagai kandidat calon presiden pada Koran Sindo). Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi Makna, 6(1), 96–116.

Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (1994). The mass media, democracy and the public sphere.

Mansell, R. (2004). Political economy, power and new media. New Media & Society, 6(1), 96–105.

McChesney, R. W. (2008). The political economy of media: Enduring issues, emerging dilemmas. NYU Press.

McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. (2015). Communication models for the study of mass communications. Routledge.

Milutinović, I. (2017). Media ownership and democratic capacity of transitional society: The case of Serbia. European Journal of Communication, 32(4), 367–380.

Neff, T., & Benson, R. (2021). News You Can Use to Promote Your Interests: Media Ownership Forms and Economic Instrumentalism. Journalism Studies, 22(15), 2103–2121.

Novianti, W. (2013). Televisi lokal dan konsentrasi kepemilikan media. Observasi, 11(1).

Nurhajati, L., & Wijayanto, X. A. (2019). Kepemilikan Media dan Isi Pemberitaan Koran Tempo. Jurnal Pewarta Indonesia, 1(1), 1–14.

Reese, S. D. (1991). Setting the media’s agenda: A power balance perspective. Annals of the International Communication Association, 14(1), 309–340.

Riedl, A. (2019). Which journalists for which democracy? Liberal-representative, deliberative and participatory roles among Austrian journalists. Journalism Studies, 20(10), 1377–1399.

Rivers, W. L. (2003). Media Massa dan Masyarakat Modern, terj. Haris Munandar Jakarta: Kencana.

Slamet, A. (2017). Media dan Masa Depan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Komunikasi, 6(1).

Sparks, C. (1995). The media as a power for democracy. Javnost-The Public, 2(1), 45–61.

Subiakto, H. (2015). Komunikasi politik, media, dan demokrasi. Prenada Media.

Susanto, E. (2021). Independensi Media Tempo Dan Pengaruh Ekonomi Politik Dalam Praktik Strukturasi. Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi, 4(1), 24–38.

Tapsell, R. (2017). Media power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, citizens and the digital revolution. Rowman & Littlefield.

Tim. (11 Mei 2023). KompasTV Soal Digugat Video Kereta Cepat: Ancaman Pers Gaya Baru. cnnindonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20230511124111-92-948211/kompastv-soal-digugat-video-kereta-cepat-ancaman-pers-gaya-baru

Febrianto, F (15 Mei 2023) Cerita Soal Bisnis Surya Paloh yang Diduga Terdampak Usai NasDem Deklarasi Anies Baswedan. Tempo.co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1725908/cerita-soal-bisnis-surya-paloh-yang-diduga-terdampak-usai-nasdem-deklarasi-anies-baswedan

Ahda Bayhaqi (27 Agustus 2023). asdem Ungkap Perusahaan Surya Paloh Diganggu Pemerintah karena Dukung Anies. Liputan6.com. https://www.liputan6.com/pemilu/read/5381526/nasdem-ungkap-perusahaan-surya-paloh-diganggu-pemerintah-karena-dukung-anies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v20i1.1446

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.